The Federal Trade Commission has secured a historic order with Amazon.com, Inc., as well as Senior Vice President Neil Lindsay and Vice President Jamil Ghani, settling allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent, and knowingly made it difficult for consumers to cancel. Amazon will be required to pay a $1 billion civil penalty, provide $1.5 billion in refunds back to consumers harmed by their deceptive Prime enrollment practices, and cease unlawful enrollment and cancellation practices for Prime.
“Today, the Trump-Vance FTC made history and secured a record-breaking, monumental win for the millions of Americans who are tired of deceptive subscriptions that feel impossible to cancel,” said FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson. “The evidence showed that Amazon used sophisticated subscription traps designed to manipulate consumers into enrolling in Prime, and then made it exceedingly hard for consumers to end their subscription. Today, we are putting billions of dollars back into Americans’ pockets, and making sure Amazon never does this again. The Trump-Vance FTC is committed to fighting back when companies try to cheat ordinary Americans out of their hard-earned pay.”
The FTC has charged Amazon and several Amazon executives with knowingly misleading millions of consumers into enrolling in Prime, violating the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA). The FTC alleged Amazon created confusing and deceptive user interfaces to lead consumers to enroll in Prime without their knowledge. Compounding these deceptive enrollment practices, Amazon also created a complex and difficult process for consumers seeking to cancel their Prime subscription, with the goal of preventing consumers from cancelling Prime. Amazon documents discovered in the lead up to trial showed that Amazon executives and employees knowingly discussed these unlawful enrollment and cancellation issues, with comments like “subscription driving is a bit of a shady world” and leading consumers to unwanted subscriptions is “an unspoken cancer.”
The historic monetary judgment contained in the settlement is only the third ROSCA case in which the FTC has obtained a civil penalty. It includes:
- a $1 billion civil penalty, which is the largest ever in a case involving an FTC rule violation;
- $1.5 billion in consumer redress, providing full relief for the estimated 35 million consumers impacted by unwanted Prime enrollment or deferred cancellation. This is the second-highest restitution award ever obtained by FTC action.
Additionally, the settlement requires Amazon to stop their unlawful practices and make meaningful changes to the Prime enrollment and cancellation flows by:
- including a clear and conspicuous button for customers to decline Prime. Amazon can no longer have a button that says, “No, I don’t want Free Shipping.”
- Including clear and conspicuous disclosures about all material terms of Prime during the Prime enrollment process, such as the cost, the date and frequency of charges to consumers, whether the subscription auto-renews, and cancellation procedures.
- creating an easy way for consumers to cancel Prime, using the same method that consumers used to sign up. The process cannot be difficult, costly, or time-consuming and must be available using the same method that consumers used to sign up; and
- paying for an independent, third-party supervisor to monitor Amazon’s compliance with the consumer redress distribution process.
The Commission vote approving the stipulated final order was 3-0. The FTC filed the proposed order in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.
NOTE: Stipulated final orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.
Powerhouse law firm Troutman Amin, LLP will have more content on this developing story on TCPAWorld.com, CIPAWorld.com and its YouTube channel (@deservetowin) shortly.
Discover more from TCPAWorld
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Couldn’t happen to a better company. No way to plead poverty either. Now while the conclusion of the case is during the Trump-Vance era. Truth is this case was originally filed before they were in power, by then FTC Chair Lina M. Khan…
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/06/ftc-takes-action-against-amazon-enrolling-consumers-amazon-prime-without-consent-sabotaging-their
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/amazon-rosca-public-redacted-complaint-to_be_filed.pdf
“The Trump-Vance FTC is committed to fighting back when companies try to cheat ordinary Americans out of their hard-earned pay.”
Yeah, right (as long as you’re not a bank) which of course explains just why they’re killing the CFPB…
https://apnews.com/article/trump-consumer-protection-cease-1b93c60a773b6b5ee629e769ae6850e9
https://www.usnews.com/banking/articles/trumps-cfpb-has-dropped-more-than-20-cases-consumers-could-miss-out-on-over-3-billion-dollars
Here’s just one (of many) CFPB victories regarding scammer telemarketing firms – a $1.8 Billion score against Lexington Law (to be paid to 43 million victims)- subject of countless TCPA suits as far back as 2013!!
“In August 2023, the CFPB secured a legal judgment against the credit repair conglomerate, after a district court ruled that the companies had violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule’s advance fee prohibition. Under federal law, credit repair companies that engage in telemarketing cannot collect fees until they provide documentation showing they have achieved the promised results for consumers, at least six months after the results were achieved.”
“Following the district court’s ruling, the companies filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, shuttering approximately 80 percent of their business operations, including their telemarketing call centers.”
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-announces-return-of-1-8-billion-in-illegal-junk-fees-to-4-3-million-americans-harmed-in-massive-credit-repair-scheme/
Hooray! Could not have happened to a more deserving entity. Now, if there could be some way to bring an end to all of the Amazon scam telemarketing calls.
Put into context…
Amazon revenue for 2024 was $638 BILLION. Breaks down to $1.74 BILLION/day.
So that’s less than 2 days or revenue; for more depressing news its $1.214 MILLION/minute!
Senor Bezos didn’t even flinch (I was gonna make a snide comment about licking boots – but remembered this blog is about regulatory content)…
OK one last thing: So while the specific type of penalty seems to be the fine print here as fa as the ‘record breaking’ claims:
“$1 billion civil penalty, which is the largest ever in a case involving an FTC rule violation”
“$1.5 billion … is the second-highest restitution award ever obtained by FTC action.”
The $ amounts are minuscule* compared to FTC fines of yesteryear. Let’s take a trip back in time to July 2019:
“The FTC’s $5 billion punishment against Facebook sets a new record as the largest penalty ever assessed against a tech company that broke a past promise to the government to improve its privacy practices — more than 200 times greater than the previous largest fine.”
Yep, that’s $5 BILLION** for breaking promises – yet another ‘category’ for the record book…
And the pols back then were noting the ‘slap on the wrist’ reality – now THAT seems to be the pattern – they need to fine a percentage of revenue -that’s the ONLY way these actions will have any real effect. Hit ’em where it hurts!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/07/12/ftc-votes-approve-billion-settlement-with-facebook-privacy-probe/
*As I already pointed out based on Amazon 2024 annual revenue of $638 BILLION, the combined $2.5 BILLION in this case is only approx 3.85%
**At that time Facebook annual revenue was $60 BILLION (less than one tenth of Amazons), so it was approx. 8.5% and that’s what they decried as the ‘slap on the wrist’!! To hit Amazon with the same amount would be $54.2 BILLION (not accounting for inflation)
Now, I’m done 😉