You folks might remember I covered a story about ETN America and officer Shlomi Cohen being sued by the Wolf in a TCPA class action.
ETN responded by issuing a press release doubling down on its TCPA compliance efforts, which I thought was pretty savy.
Well turns out ETN settled the case with the Wolf– not sure how much, if any, money was paid but a settlement was entered into– and the Court ordered ETN to reveal its lead source as part of the deal.
In Friel v. ETN America, et al. 2026 WL 146672 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 20, 2026) the Wolf moved to compel ETN to identify the lead source after ETN refused to do so in discovery. ETN didn’t really have grounds to refuse to the disclosure– it is plainly discoverable– but apparently the lead source had some sort of confidentiality provision in its contract preventing ETN from naming it.
Pause.
What?
If you are a lead buyer and your lead seller has a provision in its contract banning you from speaking its name– that’s a pretty big red flag!
Unpause.
The Court in Friel made short work of ETN’s position and ordered it to provide the name of the lead seller to the Wolf within seven days.
So, yeah.
You can fully expect the Wolf to sue the lead seller in a new TCPA class action and I will be eagerly awaiting that so I can report the identity of the lead seller that got ETN into this mess. Will be interesting.
Speaking of interesting– best marketing/advertising legal/compliance show in the country is Law Conference of Champions May 4-6, 2026 and tickets are NOW ON SALE! Get them while they last!
Chat soon.
Discover more from TCPAWorld
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

