TCPA Quick Hitter: Clinton Strange Denied Fee Waiver Because Litigation Costs of his TCPA Suits Are “Discretionary Spending”

2 Comments

Its always interesting to get a peek at how the other half lives.

In a proceeding in district court in Maine, repeat TCPA plaintiff—and frequent tcpaworld.com commenter—Clinton Strange submitted a detailed affidavit regarding his financial condition in moving for a waiver of filings fees.

In recommending denial of the request, the magistrate judge note Clinton’s multiple TCPA suits and the thousands of dollars in fees and costs he had sunk into pursuing them as “discretionary” spending that should not be counted when assessing his ability to pay the proposed filing fees in the case before the court. The MJ recommends that Strange either pay the required $402.00 filing fee, or face dismissal of his case.

The case is Strange v. Juice Man, No. 1:20-cv-00466-LEW, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2910 (D. Me. January 7, 2021) for the curious.

Categories:

Published by Eric J. Troutman

The Czar of TCPAWorld Eric Troutman is one of the country’s prominent class action defense lawyers and is nationally recognized in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation and compliance. He has served as lead defense counsel in more than 70 national TCPA class actions and has litigated nearly a thousand individual TCPA cases in his role as national strategic litigation counsel for major banks and finance companies. He also helps industry participants build TCPA-compliant processes, policies, and systems. Eric has built a national litigation practice based upon deep experience, rigorous analysis and extraordinary responsiveness. Eric and his team feel equally at home litigating multibillion dollar telecommunications class actions in federal court as they do developing and executing national litigation strategies for institutions facing an onslaught of individual TCPA matters. They thrive in each of these roles – delivering consistently excellent results – while never losing sight of the client experience. While many firms now tout TCPA expertise, Eric has been there from the beginning. He built one of the country’s first TCPA-only defense teams and began serving as national TCPA counsel for his clients nearly a decade ago. This perspective allows him to swiftly develop the right litigation strategies for dealing with recurring problems, without wasting time on tactics that are bound to fail. Eric’s rich historical perspective and encyclopedic knowledge of the TCPA landscape also make him an invaluable resource to institutional compliance teams struggling to comply with the shifting regulatory landscape. No task is too small – or too big. Indeed, Eric and his team have helped build TCPA-compliant systems and processes for some of the largest and most complex corporate entities in the country. He commonly works with in-house compliance counsel to build and implement enterprise and business-line specific TCPA solutions, performs TCPA audits and drafts and reviews proposed TCPA policies and procedures. He and his team also have the technical expertise necessary to assist call centers seeking to develop TCPA-resistant call path architecture or to modify existing telephony and software integration to better insulate from potential TCPA exposure. Eric has built a reputation for thought leadership. An avid blogger and speaker, he has been at the forefront of the industry’s effort to push for clarity and a return to sanity for the TCPA for years. He was selected to advocate for the financial services industry on important TCPA issues before the Federal Communications Commission and co-authored the nation’s only comprehensive practice guide on TCPA defense. In his spare time, Eric leads defense teams representing banks and other financial services companies in consumer finance litigation matters. He has experience representing clients in UCC, TILA, RESPA FCRA, CCRA, CLRA, FDCPA, RFDCPA and FCCPA claims, as well as in fraud and bank operations issues.

2 Comments

  1. Dear Czar: My feelings are so hurt that that the Court denied my motion for IFP (wink-n-smile), it’s sure a shame because those affidavits and financial information [filed into the record under seal at the outset] establishes my standing as a consumer debtor under the FDCPA..
    I have to run to the post office and get a $402 money order now, so I’ll check ‘ya later,

    Best wishes from Louisiana,
    Clinton Strange 😉

    Reply

Leave a Reply