FRALISH CASHES IN: Repeat TCPA Litigator Hits CETERIS PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC for $761k TCPA Class Settlement

1 Comment

Quick one for you folks.

In Fralish v. Ceteris 2023 WL 6057378 (N.D. Ind. Sept 15, 2023) the Court approved a settlement in a TCPA class action totaling $761,850.00. Of that $249,623.30 went to the lawyers–Mr. Number One strikes again–and $5,000.00 went to Mr. Fralish.

That leaves about $500k to be distributed among the class members makin claims. (I am informed each class member will get about $700.00–that’s pretty good coin.)

This was a case involving ringless voicemails BTW  and, apparently, a good number of these were sent to wrong numbers.

The class was pretty small–which is why the settlement dollars are not terribly high–but you can tell that these cases can get expensive very quickly.

This is why you need to use the Reassigned Numbers Database folks!!!

Also be sure to request a FREE copy of the 2023 TCPA Annual review so you have all the tips and tricks you need to stay safe!:

ITS HERE ITS HERE! TROUTMAN FIRM’S INCREDIBLE 2023 TCPA ANNUAL REVIEW–PRESENTED BY TRUSTEDFORM–IS NOW AVAILABLE!

Categories:

Published by Eric J. Troutman

The Czar of TCPAWorld Eric Troutman is one of the country’s prominent class action defense lawyers and is nationally recognized in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation and compliance. He has served as lead defense counsel in more than 70 national TCPA class actions and has litigated nearly a thousand individual TCPA cases in his role as national strategic litigation counsel for major banks and finance companies. He also helps industry participants build TCPA-compliant processes, policies, and systems. Eric has built a national litigation practice based upon deep experience, rigorous analysis and extraordinary responsiveness. Eric and his team feel equally at home litigating multibillion dollar telecommunications class actions in federal court as they do developing and executing national litigation strategies for institutions facing an onslaught of individual TCPA matters. They thrive in each of these roles – delivering consistently excellent results – while never losing sight of the client experience. While many firms now tout TCPA expertise, Eric has been there from the beginning. He built one of the country’s first TCPA-only defense teams and began serving as national TCPA counsel for his clients nearly a decade ago. This perspective allows him to swiftly develop the right litigation strategies for dealing with recurring problems, without wasting time on tactics that are bound to fail. Eric’s rich historical perspective and encyclopedic knowledge of the TCPA landscape also make him an invaluable resource to institutional compliance teams struggling to comply with the shifting regulatory landscape. No task is too small – or too big. Indeed, Eric and his team have helped build TCPA-compliant systems and processes for some of the largest and most complex corporate entities in the country. He commonly works with in-house compliance counsel to build and implement enterprise and business-line specific TCPA solutions, performs TCPA audits and drafts and reviews proposed TCPA policies and procedures. He and his team also have the technical expertise necessary to assist call centers seeking to develop TCPA-resistant call path architecture or to modify existing telephony and software integration to better insulate from potential TCPA exposure. Eric has built a reputation for thought leadership. An avid blogger and speaker, he has been at the forefront of the industry’s effort to push for clarity and a return to sanity for the TCPA for years. He was selected to advocate for the financial services industry on important TCPA issues before the Federal Communications Commission and co-authored the nation’s only comprehensive practice guide on TCPA defense. In his spare time, Eric leads defense teams representing banks and other financial services companies in consumer finance litigation matters. He has experience representing clients in UCC, TILA, RESPA FCRA, CCRA, CLRA, FDCPA, RFDCPA and FCCPA claims, as well as in fraud and bank operations issues.

1 Comment

  1. I agree that this is a sad case. Sad that the scumbag telemarketer only had to pay 3/4 million. Sad that the class could not have been bigger so that more consumers could have been compensated for being injured by these scumbag telemarketers. Sad that the attorneys — on both sides — are the ones pocketing the bulk of the “bonanza.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply