“If you are a lawyer that relies on AI for anything you are a failure as an attorney.”
Always opinionated is the Czar…
Strong words. But those are my words.
And it is an important reminder.
Generative AI has no place in the practice of law. At least not yet.
The day may come when that is no longer true, but as of today anyone relying on Chat GPT or anything remotely similar to prepare briefs, analyze cases, write blogs… whatever. You’re a failure. And you don’t deserve to be part of this profession.
Just my opinion of course.
But did you catch the story of the Stanford *cough* professor who was paid $600.00 an hour to write a report in litigation and used AI to do it?
His report apparently cited to two papers as authority that did not actually exist.
The opposing attorney in the case argued: “[t]he citation bears the hallmarks of being an artificial intelligence (AI) ‘hallucination,’ suggesting that at least the citation was generated by a large language model like ChatGPT,” Bednarz wrote. “Plaintiffs do not know how this hallucination wound up in Hancock’s declaration, but it calls the entire document into question, especially when much of the commentary contains no methodology or analytic logic whatsoever.”
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/stanford-professor-lying-and-technology-19937258.php
Sigh.
Ironically, the expert report was submitted to support a ban on deepfakes in social media. I don’t even know what to say about that.
But there are a few take aways here:
- Stanford. ha.
- AI. ha.
Be sure to hire yourself REAL LAWYERS. The type who don’t use AI in some pathetic effort to maximize profit or imagine it will somehow make them more efficient.
Ridiculous. Knowledge. Hard work. Expertise. These things lead to efficiency. They also lead to higher rates.
Apropos.
LAST REMINDER: Troutman Amin, LLP Rates Go UP January 1, 2025 and I am Serious
Love you all (even the Stanford people, now that the Big Game is over.)
Discover more from TCPAWorld
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

AI agrees., lawyers should hire experts. Real experts. Good experts. Experts who don’t make stuff up. (Article: Intrinsic value of using experts in high value disputes, Natural History Magazine, June 6, 1978)