WE’RE BACK BABY!!!: Deserve to Win Podcast IS BACK with Ep. 27 and “Baby Shark” TCPA Class Lawyer Alex Kruzyk and other BIG NEWS!!!

Well we took a long break between episodes as the Czar and Queenie were on a national speaking tour all throughout the summer.

But we’re back and have an absolutely packed episode that cannot be missed.

Yes we talk Trump and the election, the one-to-one, and the revocation ruling and AI and really everything you could possibly want to know about the TCPA in a 1 hour format.

Just critical stuff.

But you come for the news but you can’t miss the interview.

Alex Kruzyk is the latest MONSTER TCPA litigator on the plaintiffs’ side and he joins us to discuss his new practice.

Alex Kruzyk on the Deserve to Win podcast… 

Alex grew up under Greenwald– the ultimate TCPA monster–and he is already showing off with TCPA settlements under his belt.

The guy is laser focused on suing real estate purchasers/investors– guys that cold call people asking if they want to sell their house.

Alex is convinced this qualifies as telephone solicitation– he’s wrong, but the courts keep agreeing with him.

Plus wait until you hear about his view on the new one-to-one rule– my goodness.

Anyway definitely an interview you can’t miss.

Brittany even characterized it as “fine,” which means it was really good. hahahahaha
Enjoy the show everyone!

And, of course, if you want to watch all of the great Deserve to Win episodes out there be sure to visit youdeservetowin.com! 

Love ya’ll chat soon.


Discover more from TCPAWorld

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories:

1 Comment

  1. Insightful podcast as always. The real estate bottom-feeders are to blame for 80% of the spam calls and texts I’ve received this year, and I’m glad that Mr. Kruzyk is fighting these cases and winning. However, I wish that 227(b) was still a viable approach for tackling this issue rather than classifying the calls as DNC violations under 227(c). The problem is not that brokers are reaching out to property owners regarding specific plots of land that have attracted clients’ interest. It’s that miscreants have automated the process, and are blanketing entire regions with predictive dialer calls to cell phone numbers that were probably stolen in data breaches. If the ATDS definition were fixed, we’d be able to address the bad actors under 227(b) without creating case law that is ultimately going to harm legitimate realtors.

Leave a Reply