Getting a ton of press inquiries right now. Love you all but don’t have time to statements to each of you today. Please feel free to use any portion of this for your work. Thank you!
While R.E.A.C.H. generally supports the one-to-one rule the way it is drafted will have very damaging consequences for small business that were simply not intended. The previous administration did not adequately consider the impact on small business and more time is needed to absorb input and modify the rule so it makes sense for consumers and businesses alike.
Most problematically is the rule’s requirement that consumers hear from only on behalf of a single specific entity when it is often not possible to know what specific entity will provide the good or service the consumer wants. For instance, in the insurance context if a consumer agreed to hear from GEICO only then a broker could not advise a consumer about a Progressive product—even if it was cheaper and provided better coverage. And a consumer cannot just agree to hear from “Allstate” as a brand, but would have to check separate boxes for any Allstate entity that might provide the insurance product the consumer was looking for—otherwise an Allstate agent could not complete a call with the consumer after determining the consumer checked the wrong Allstate entity for the type of insurance they are looking for.
I am using examples of well known brands but the impact is actually much worse for small businesses—like the brokers in these scenarios, but also like smaller insurers and lenders who do not have the name recognition of national brands and are not likely to be selected by a consumer on a webform, even if they have better rates and service.
We are hoping to see the rule pushed 60 days to allow more time for consideration of these issues. Otherwise the predatory TCPA lawsuits against small businesses may start as early as Monday.
Thank you.
Discover more from TCPAWorld
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
