HIGH STAKES: Attorney May Face Discipline–Even Disbarment– For Shoddy Work Defending TCPA Suit

Most people don’t know that I actually started this blog to help other lawyers defend TCPA cases.

I’m serious.

I was so sick and tired of other attorneys screwing up TCPA defense– that, in turn, created bad case law for my clients– I decided to analyze every case for everyone and give my thoughts on strategy and tactics so that everyone could learn and improve.

To this day we have hundreds of followers from other law firms, and I never out them.

Dozens request a free copy of my annual review each year. I freely give them.

Heck, we even welcome rival attorneys attending our Law Conference of Champions— although they have to pay full price for a ticket. 🙂

One of my core missions is to share information and help educate the defense bar so that we can all win more cases!

Unfortunately not every attorney subscribes to TCPAWorld. And many– particularly in #biglaw– move forward with arrogance and hubris only to get smacked down and shamed.

That’s too bad.

But what more can I do?

I suppose I can share this story out of Washington.

Its sort of a cautionary tale for everyone but I don’t chalk it up to bad lawyering so much as somebody apparently just being in way over their head. (Its different.)

In Barton v. Delfgauw, 2025 WL 1707568 (W.D. Wash June 18, 2025) a defense lawyer in a TCPA suit made a bunch of mistakes while litigating in federal court, culminating in apparently filing a very damaging document contrary to her client’s instructions.

Not good.

As the Court put it, had this been her first mistake in the case the Court might have let her off with a warning. Instead the numerous errors demonstrated in the action lead the court to conclude disciplinary action– i.e. potential disbarment or suspension–should be considered.

Eesh.

Here’s the meet of the analysis:

Under Local Civil Rule 83.3(a), lawyers practicing in this Court are obligated to comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct. Discipline for violations of the RPCs can include suspension from the practice of law in this Court, reprimand or admonition, financial penalties, or referral to other disciplinary authorities, and can include supervision conditions including continuing legal education. LCR 83.3(c)(4). Under Local Civil Rule 83.3(c)(5), a judge of this Court may initiate discipline on its own motion, which is referred to the Chief Judge. When the Chief Judge is the initiating judge, “he or she must refer it to another judge.” Id. The reviewing judge may determine that the matter is best handled by the WSBA and make a referral to that or another authority. Id. The respondent attorney must be given notice and the opportunity to respond. LCR 83.3(c (5)(C). Because of the history of sanctions in this case, counsel’s WSBA disciplinary history for similar failures of diligence, and the evidence adduced of an RPC violation(s), this Court will make a referral to the next most senior active judge in this District, Judge Tana Lin, to determine if discipline should be imposed under Local Civil Rule 83.3 and/or whether this matter should be referred to the WSBA for their consideration.

Pretty wide range of options here. She could get off with a sternly worded order and perhaps some CLE. Or she could end up referred to WSBA for enhanced penalties. Tough to say for now. But we will keep an eye on it.

Should be noted that the attorney wasn’t going up against one of the great litigation attorneys in TCPAWorld either. She was litigating against a guy without a lawyer– albeit a sophisticated guy without a lawyer, Nathan Barton. And the case was not even a class action.

Just goes to show the level of caution, accuracy, and intelligence needed to constantly litigate in federal court is simply above the capabilities of many attorneys. Layer in the complexities of class litigation and the incredible depth and speed of developments in TCPA substantive law–not to mention the insanely high penalties for failing to comply with the statute– and TCPA class action defense really is the perfect storm for attorneys.

There’s no more dangerous area of law out there folks, and no higher stakes litigation. Choose your counsel wisely!

And make sure your counsel is being EDUCATED by the best! Law Conference of Champions is less than a month away! Tons of CLE credit available and CRITICAL sessions on TCPA will be presented.

Your attorneys need to be there!

Chat soon!


Discover more from TCPAWorld

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories:

8 Comments

  1. Holy, moley!!! Shoddy!? Come on Eric, you’re being way too diplomatic…

    A quik deep dive finds these; are all excellent reads, as far as cautionary tales go!!

    Current case sanctions (document # 490!!):
    https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.302688/gov.uscourts.wawd.302688.490.0.pdf

    Seems the only excuse she didn’t use was ‘the dog ate my homework’ lol

    Previous sanctions:
    https://www.mywsba.org/WebFiles/CusDocs/000000033583-0/004.pdf

    Original case complaint (2021):
    https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.302688/gov.uscourts.wawd.302688.1.0.pdf

    Not to mention that defendant Joe Delfgauw has a very let’s just say ‘noteworthy’ past, that’s me being incredibly diplomatic (to lengthy to dig back into – I did once and was overwhelmed)

  2. Hey, James, you missed the best one. A felony conviction for bank fraud. Certainly, the man is eminently qualified to be a telemarketer.

    1. Don’t know how I missed that, I must be slippin’ in my old age – yikes!

      Sounds like the proverbial icing on the cake – if you can add a link I’d love to read it 😉

  3. United States of America v. Joseph Delfgauw, Case No. 18-cr-20030 (E.D. Mich.)

  4. OK I swear I’m done after this…
    This may or may not answer my Q – Seems while his case was in progress he started another 2 corporations, (out of his 122 in total per OpenCorporates) and even started another on the day he was released from probation…

    GOOD REP MEDIA INC (Michigan (US), 7 Jan 2019-)
    VYBE STUDIOS INC. (Michigan (US), 6 Jan 2020- )
    MOUNTAINTOP AFFILIATE NETWORK INC. (Michigan (US), 4 Jun 2020- )

    *case ran from 12/7/2018 – 6/4/2020

Leave a Reply