“NO STOP”: TCPA Defendant Tries to Double Negative Its Way Out of a Class Action (It Doesn’t Work)

So to a TCPA defendant down in Florida the phrase “No Stop” apparently means “yes continue” and that’s just a little too date rapey for me.

In Blosley v. A Bradley Hospitality 2025 WL 2686984 (S.D. Fl. Sept 19, 2025) a Plaintiff allegedly responded “no stop” to a series of allegedly unwanted text messages from the Defendant.

Rather than accept this as a revocation of consent, the Defendant went full drunken frat boy and argued “no stop” actually meant Plaintiff wanted the messages to continue.

In the Defendant’s view the phrase should be read to say “don’t stop” as opposed to “no, stop.” In fact Defendant argued that not only was Plaintiff’s phrase not a revocation but it was ACTUALLY AFFIRMATIVE CONSENT to continue the messaging:

Defendant contends that pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 64.1200(a)(1), there can be no TCPA violation where a plaintiff expressly consents to receiving the text and has not otherwise revoked that consent since that individual would no longer be on the entity’s do-notcall list. Defendant argues that the phrase “No stop” indicated to the Defendant that it should continue to send the telemarketing messages to Plaintiff’s phone number and therefore it did not need to put Plaintiff on its internal do-not-call list. The Court finds Defendant’s argument unpersuasive.

“Unpersuasive” is putting it mildly.

To be fair to defendant, the message plaintiff responded to included a “reply stop to opt out” prompt so saying “no stop” might be viewed as a directive not to stop the messages. Its one of those double negative situations I guess.

But I must say I agree with the court on this one. If someone texts “no stop” you should be “yes stopping.”

Also, Troutman Amin, LLP rates are jumping soon– so reach out and get signed up and save a fortune my friends.

THE FIRST $6K AN HOUR ATTORNEY?: Troutman Amin, LLP Rates Set to Rise January 1, 2026– Get In Now!

Chat soon.


Discover more from TCPAWorld

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories:

2 Comments

  1. I have tried STOP and it does not work. I have tried F–K OFF and that does not work. I have tried K–S MY A– and that does not work. Do you have any better suggestions?

  2. Heck I’ve even used Eat Sh*t and Die – all to no avail. Too bad we can’t post images I could show you a random sampling of more than 100 texts that only 3 replied as you are unsubscribed from this number:

    “NETWORK MSG: You replied with the word “stop” which blocks all texts sent from this number. Text back “unstop” or “start” to receive messages again.” But only from this #!!!!! Gee, thanks!!

    Then there’s my perennial favorite:
    “Free Msg: Receiver 18437390781 unable to receive message – Message Blocking is active.”

    In other words: Take that you unwitting victimized NDNC registrant – we do what we want when we want and have the sheer audacity to reply that we block your attempts to opt-out!!!!

    Here’s the rarity when a legit company responds properly:
    HELP: “For help with the Kroger Family of Companies, please call support at
    1-800-576-4377. Msg & Data Rates may apply. Msg freq may vary. Reply STOP to end.”

    STOP: “You have opted-out and will receive no further messages from the Kroger Family of Companies. For info visit Kroger.com” From them in total – not just one #!!!!

Leave a Reply