Nothing more frustrating for a TCPA defendant than to be facing suit in a class action for sending a message the consumer consented to.
But the way the rules in litigation work, generally the defendant is stuck in the case past the pleadings stage and cannot get out until later in the case when evidence outside the complaint can be considered by the court.
Take Zelma v. Wonder Group, Inc. 2025 WL 2976546 (D. N.J. Oct. 22, 2025) for example.
There the defendant swore up and down the plaintiff consented to the messages and that is the only reason they were sent. But it doesn’t matter. The Plaintiff alleged the messages were sent WITHOUT consent– and that is dispositive at the pleadings stage.
As the Court said: “Although Defendant may be correct that the Verification Texts were sent in response to Plaintiff registering his phone number on its website, its fact-based argument is not appropriate for the Court to consider at the motion to dismiss stage.”
While the motion was a waste of money–it had not chance of success–I don’t fault these guys for trying. Like I said, this is extremely frustrating for TCPA defendants and sometimes venting in papers to the court is worth the money.
The backstory here is interesting. Plaintiff claims he received two random text messages from Wonder stating: “Your Wonder verification code is 041797” and “Your Wonder verification code is 475599.”
The messages made him wonder where the came from– thank you very much–and his theory is that the messages were trojan horse designed to make people research Wonder and then, apparently, want to buy stuff after they learn about the company.
Court did not buy the trojan horse theory but it did find the messages might have been random and so ATDS allegations were accepted as plausible at the pleadings stage.
Will keep an eye on this one.
And you should keep an eye on Troutman Amin, LLP rates! Going up January 1, 2026.
THE FIRST $6K AN HOUR ATTORNEY?: Troutman Amin, LLP Rates Set to Rise January 1, 2026– Get In Now!
Chat soon.
Discover more from TCPAWorld
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

“… its fact-based argument is not appropriate for the Court to consider at the motion to dismiss stage.”
Wow.