$1,000 A CALL!: Failure To Identify Carries Steep Penalties In Washington State

Washington’s CEMA mini-TCPA has been drawing a lot of attention lately–especially as Courts around the country struggle with whether the TCPA’s DNC provisions apply to SMS messages.

There’s no question that CEMA DOES apply to SMS messages– and in a big way. Troutman Amin, LLP recently put out a critical compliance alert because so many companies are getting caught up under the statute!

COMPLIANCE ALERT: Washington State’s CEMA Is Too Dangerous To Ignore–Critical One Sheeter Now Available!

But Washington’s dense marketing laws have other critical provisions to keep in mind as well.

For instance WASH. REV. CODE § 80.36.390(3)) provides  “[a] person making a  telephone solicitation must identify him or herself and the company or organization on whose behalf the solicitation is being made and the purpose of the call within the first 30 seconds of the telephone call.”

Pretty straightforward requirement– and one that you’d think most companies would have no problem meeting.

Still in Barton v. George, 2025 WL 3078287 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 4, 2025) a defendant apparently did not identify itself on a call–bad move.

Barton walked to an easy judgment for $1,000.00 per call.

The Barton case was not a class action–but you can imagine how easy it might be bring a class suit in circumstances where a marketer is not timely disclosing their identity!

Don’t get this one wrong folks.

In the meantime Troutman Amin, LLP rates jump January 1, 2026– and everyone here at ANA in Chicago seems to be fully aware of that fact. Haha. Tons of interest and new client inquiries. Don’t get left paying higher prices for no reason!

THE FIRST $6K AN HOUR ATTORNEY?: Troutman Amin, LLP Rates Set to Rise January 1, 2026– Get In Now!

Chat soon.


Discover more from TCPAWorld

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories:

Leave a Reply