IS THIS THE FUTURE AFTER FACEBOOK?: New Robocall Class Action Seeks $5,000 a Call Under Virginia State Law

As TCPAWorld denizens know well, 2021 is stacking up to be a monster year for the TCPA.

Indeed, in the next 60 days we are expecting a ruling from the United States Supreme Court on the TCPA’s definition of automated telephone dialing systems that may CHANGE EVERYTHING.

Most of us are expecting SCOTUS to adopt a narrow TCPA ATDS definition–meaning that the federal response to robocall will suddenly be limited to claims about pre-recorded calls and DNC violations. But true “autodialed” calls–whatever that means–will no longer be actionable.

Again, that’s if the Supreme Court reads the TCPA’s ATDS definition narrowly (and it will.) 

But just because the federal “robocall” statute might be on the way out that doesn’t mean that callers are free to ramp up their dialers. Indeed, the well-funded and enterprising Plaintiffs’ bar is on the hunt for the next big thing, even as TCPA ATDS cases continue to be viable in many jurisdictions.

No surprise that state law corollaries to the TCPA are attracting big attention at the moment, and perhaps no state has a more interesting (scary?) anti-robocall statute than Virginia.

The Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act  (VTPPA) limits marketing calls to numbers on the DNC–much like the TCPA– but purports to create a $5,000.00 per call damage remedy and appears to authorize a private right of action. (The case law here is developing so I don’t want to get out ahead of myself.) And it appears that class action treatment may (may) be available under Rule 23 although such actions are not generally recognized under state law in Virginia.

To wit, a new class action suit was just filed yesterday in the E.D.Va. alleging that Marketpro Homebuyers violated both the TCPA and the VTPPA by sending unsolcited marketing texts. (Notably the texts at issue were actually offers to purchase a home from the call recipient, so it is not at all clear that these messages were actually marketing.)

The complaint seeks to recover an eye-popping $5,000 per call on behalf of certain class members. The complaint can be found here: Cavey complaint

So is in the works? Well, no (although I’m sure some squatter just picked up the domain to spite me.) Nonetheless, its a brave new world for callers as state-level robocall statutes are receiving more attention than ever.

And as the new Cavey filing demonstrates some of these state laws purport to offer remedies that dwarf the meager $500.00 per call remedies available under the TCPA.

More to come on this. Unfortunately.

Also, Billy Howard’s shop just teamed up with Kazerouni law to file a TCPA class action in California yesterday and its freaking me out a little bit.

And one last note– the Squire Paton Boggs 2020 TCPA Year End Review, presented by Drips, is just about done! This year’s edition is bigger than ever before. Get your pre-orders in for this FREE breakdown of the TCPA year that was in 2020 RIGHT NOW.



  1. If the public is no longer harassed (as I have been by: Robocallers — Call Centers so persistent I don’t want to pick up a cellphone (auto warranties by numerous vendors) or I can only imagine how terrible it had to be during the elections to the Annual Enrollment Period for Medicare Advantage. People over 55 deserve a break from this — actually all ages, A senior citizen rarely picks up a cell phone call or any call that doesn’t identify itself. Even after the person has committed to receiving a call from a representative about a certain product through FaceBook.

    Perhaps for those of us who make our living by phone but are not associated with any large organization (we are alone) you might provide the TCPA disclaimers necessary for Cell, SMS, Text, Email, VOIP calls, and anything I missed? As a sole proprietor with my own Website about to go up which will have SEO, Landing pages, collect health information by the consumer (HIPPA language also needed?) — It is confusing. “Getting written consent” is what you said with Justin Thomas. There is no way to run these inquiries through DNC– nor should there be with “written consent” providing authorization for me to contact them.

    I have already referred your organization to 2 larger IMO organizations– over time I am sure my referrals will pay off for you.

    Kind regards,
    Mark Gregoire
    Principal, Life Insurance Broker — Term, Permanent and Final Expense Plans
    Respected Trusted Advisor to Individuals, Families and Family Businesses
    Employer Benefits Srategist for all sizes of Employers for 35+ years
    Direct: (413) 218-8317 — Email:

    FYI –
    — is not up yet — soon

Leave a Reply