MILESTONE MAY!!!: May, 2024 Was Arguably Troutman Amin, LLP’s Biggest Month Yet!! But So Much More is In Store

1 Comment

The Troutman Amin, LLP partners crushed May!!!

What a May!!!

The month opened with our one year anniversary!

Then the news dropped that Brittany (Baroness) had made partner at Troutman Amin, LLP!

ITS OFFICIAL!!: THE AMAZING BARONESS–BRITTANY ANDRES–IS NOW A PARTNER AT TROUTMAN AMIN, LLP

Then our YouTube channel hit 100k views!

“Deserve to Win” earned a trademark!

Our conference sold out!

SO MUCH WINNING ITS CRAZY: “Deserve to Win” Receives Official Trademark as Troutman Amin YouTube Channel Crushes and LCOC Sells Out!

And I gained my 10,000th Linkedin follower.

Not to mention an awesome free webinar:

And our 25th Deserve to Win podcast episode dropped!!!:

Cool.

Crazy awesome month!

June is off to a hot start with us attending CCW this week! (Vegas baby)

But JULY. Oh JULY.

LCOC + MailCon+ASE= ALL YOUR DREAMS COME TRUE.

Its just math.

More soon.

Discover more from TCPAWorld

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories:

Published by Eric "Czar" Troutman

The Czar of TCPAWorld Eric Troutman is one of the country’s prominent class action defense lawyers and is nationally recognized in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation and compliance. He has served as lead defense counsel in more than 70 national TCPA class actions and has litigated nearly a thousand individual TCPA cases in his role as national strategic litigation counsel for major banks and finance companies. He also helps industry participants build TCPA-compliant processes, policies, and systems. Eric has built a national litigation practice based upon deep experience, rigorous analysis and extraordinary responsiveness. Eric and his team feel equally at home litigating multibillion dollar telecommunications class actions in federal court as they do developing and executing national litigation strategies for institutions facing an onslaught of individual TCPA matters. They thrive in each of these roles – delivering consistently excellent results – while never losing sight of the client experience. While many firms now tout TCPA expertise, Eric has been there from the beginning. He built one of the country’s first TCPA-only defense teams and began serving as national TCPA counsel for his clients nearly a decade ago. This perspective allows him to swiftly develop the right litigation strategies for dealing with recurring problems, without wasting time on tactics that are bound to fail. Eric’s rich historical perspective and encyclopedic knowledge of the TCPA landscape also make him an invaluable resource to institutional compliance teams struggling to comply with the shifting regulatory landscape. No task is too small – or too big. Indeed, Eric and his team have helped build TCPA-compliant systems and processes for some of the largest and most complex corporate entities in the country. He commonly works with in-house compliance counsel to build and implement enterprise and business-line specific TCPA solutions, performs TCPA audits and drafts and reviews proposed TCPA policies and procedures. He and his team also have the technical expertise necessary to assist call centers seeking to develop TCPA-resistant call path architecture or to modify existing telephony and software integration to better insulate from potential TCPA exposure. Eric has built a reputation for thought leadership. An avid blogger and speaker, he has been at the forefront of the industry’s effort to push for clarity and a return to sanity for the TCPA for years. He was selected to advocate for the financial services industry on important TCPA issues before the Federal Communications Commission and co-authored the nation’s only comprehensive practice guide on TCPA defense. In his spare time, Eric leads defense teams representing banks and other financial services companies in consumer finance litigation matters. He has experience representing clients in UCC, TILA, RESPA FCRA, CCRA, CLRA, FDCPA, RFDCPA and FCCPA claims, as well as in fraud and bank operations issues.

1 Comment

  1. I’m commenting on this blog page coz I didn’t see another page with this webinar on it. Two things: First, the current appeal will most likely fail, not just because the factual record currently points to Bradford acting as a person under the TCPA, instead of acting on behalf of the government, but also because under the legal theory of qualified immunity, immunity does not apply if the illegality of the action was “clearly established” at the time of the action. As Perrong correctly pointed out in his briefing, the restriction on making prerecorded to cell phones without prior consent has been clearly established. Um, yeah, since 1991…more than 30 years ago.

    Second, even if this case goes to trial and the record is bolstered with more facts regarding the making of the calls, it will undoubtedly further clarify the fact that the calls were Bradford’s initiative – his idea alone, and that no one else had any involvement in creating this campaign to make it a state initiative. In fact, it might prove Perrong’s theory that this whole campaign was Bradford’s attempt to circumvent PA’s house rules prohibiting robocalls to constituents during election periods. If his defense attorneys are reading – you should settle. Actually, why would you, when you can keep billing, eh? Isn’t that how defense works? LOL. Off on a tangent, but wondering if the Commonwealth is footing Bradford’s legal bill? Shouldn’t they be doing so if he was simply working a state initiative? Hmmm.

    Reply

Leave a Reply