So not long ago I did a story on a guy who is potentially subject to arrest by federal marshals for failing to respond to a subpoena in a TCPA case.
I thought the story was so interesting I brought the lawyer responsible for the ruling onto the Deserve to Win podcast to discuss. You can check that out here:
Well today we have another story of a subpoena enforcement proceeding in a TCPA case that may also lead to jail time–so this is starting to become a trend.
In Ford v. Glutality, 2025 WL 52850 (W.D. MO Jan. 8, 2024) a lead supplier was sent a subpoena seeking lead records and communications. The supplier apparently failed to adequately respond and the plaintiff moved to compel records.
The Court ordered the production to take place and added a chilling one liner that should be a reminder to everyone of the stakes involved with civil subpoenas:
If Mr. Weiss fails to fully comply with the subpoena, the Court may hold Mr. Weiss in contempt of Court. A finding of contempt may include sanctions, including an award of attorneys’ fees and incarceration.
Incarceration. Eesh.
TCPA is as dangerous as can be folks–even if you are just responding to a subpoena. But jail time is just one risk when responding to a subpoena. Failing to assert proper objections might lead to a needless deposition or an extremely burdensome production that turns your company inside out!
If you receive a subpoena be sure to retain qualified counsel right away to help walk you through the response, assert proper objections and negotiate to prevent making a bigger (and more burdensome) production than necessary.
Quick reminder– Big Bad John Henson is joining an epic webinar in just a few minutes! Be sure to sign up if you haven’t already!
Chat soon!
Discover more from TCPAWorld
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Incarceration as an incentive! This particular judge has clearly articulated that the orders (and, a subpoena is an order) of the court say what they mean and mean what they say.