So not long ago I wrote about a case in which a TCPA defendant was likely to be sanctioned for failing to give up the name of a BPO and trying to assert a Fifth Amendment privilege in a TCPA case.
Well the defense attorney is now attempting to escape from the case but Anthony Paronich– the Wolf of TCPAWorld— is refusing to let him out easy. And it is looking pretty bad for the defense lawyer.
In Margo Simmons v. WP Lighthouse 1:24-cv-01602, Doc 40 (S.D Ind.) the Defendant was previously ordered to produce supplemental responses identifying witnesses and potentially to pay sanctions. The Defendant apparently made the supplement yet the defense counsel claimed he had not spoken to the defendant for weeks. Then the defense attorney moved to withdraw from this case.
This was odd.
The Wolf pressed him on the issue and the defense lawyer had to admit that he had placed his client’s signature on the response, without consent. The Wolf called this a “forgery” and has told the Court the defense lawyer committed a form of “fraud.”
This, coupled with the pending sanctions order that might be issued againt the lawyer has resulted in the Wolf asking the Court not to let the defense lawyer out of the case!
In the Wolf’s view the lawyer must pay the sanctions, rectify the issue with the “forged” signature and assure the defendant obtains new counsel before the attorney should be permitted to withdraw.
The defense counsel apparently owned up to at least some of the issue here stating:
“I realize that I made a mistake when I affixed Mr. Jaguines’ signature without further specific authorization from him to do so.”
Eesh.
Sooooo not good.
As I have said before, your choice of defense counsel matters folks (although in this situation seems like the client bailed on the lawyer and not vice versa.)
Hope to see everyone at Law Conference of Champions in July!
Chat soon.
Discover more from TCPAWorld
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

