EVEN HARVEY.AI AGREES GEN AI CAN’T BE TRUSTED WITH TCPA CONSENT RULES..

Received this INSANE cold pitch email today.

Harvey.ai trying to convince me to use its product.

That’s obviously nuts since Troutman Amin, LLP is on record saying it will NEVER use GenAI products for any substantive legal work. Indeed, my position is lawyers should be DISBARRED for using Gen AI– and I mean that fully.

But in order to sell me this Harvey rep literally leads with the following very telling statement:

“Saw your piece on not trusting GenAI with TCPA consent rules – agree completely.”

Wow.

So Harvey.AI literally agrees its product cannot be trusted to analyze something relatively straightfoward like TCPA consent rules.

But then the rep goes on to say:

“But where it does earn its keep is on the rest of the defense workload: motion practice, discovery, and briefing at scale across a docket like yours. ”

What the actual hell?

Your product can’t be trusted to analyze something simple like consent rules but I am supposed to trust it for complex tasks like MOTION PRACTICE, DICOVERY and BRIEFING??????

And then to make things even more insane the pitch isn’t that the product can help once in a while but AT SCALE– meaning Harvey literally wants me to handoff LARGE VOLUMES of complex legal work to a gen ai bot and hope it all goes ok?

Dear California State Bar– please investigate Harvey.AI and every single law firm it is working with. This is a malpractice machine and suspensions or disbarments should follow for every law firm/lawyer signing up here IMO.

 


Discover more from TCPAWorld

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories:

Leave a Reply